Use (uint64_t)1 instead of 1l / 1ul
This commit is contained in:
@@ -144,9 +144,9 @@ resume_3:
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
if ((op_data->fact_ver & (1ul<<(64-PG_EPOCH_BITS) - 1)) == (1ul<<(64-PG_EPOCH_BITS) - 1))
|
||||
if ((op_data->fact_ver & ((uint64_t)1 << (64-PG_EPOCH_BITS) - 1)) == ((uint64_t)1 << (64-PG_EPOCH_BITS) - 1))
|
||||
{
|
||||
assert(pg.epoch != ((1ul << PG_EPOCH_BITS)-1));
|
||||
assert(pg.epoch != (((uint64_t)1 << PG_EPOCH_BITS)-1));
|
||||
pg.epoch++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
op_data->target_ver = op_data->fact_ver + 1;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user