Add notes about VNPL in English
This commit is contained in:
+84
-10
@@ -10,8 +10,17 @@ Copyright (c) Vitaliy Filippov (vitalif [at] yourcmc.ru), 2019+
|
||||
|
||||
Join Vitastor Telegram Chat: https://t.me/vitastor
|
||||
|
||||
All server-side code (OSD, Monitor and so on) is licensed under the terms of
|
||||
Vitastor Network Public License 1.1 (VNPL 1.1), a copyleft license based on
|
||||
License: VNPL 1.1 for server-side code and dual VNPL 1.1 + GPL 2.0+ for client tools.
|
||||
|
||||
Server-side code is licensed only under the terms of VNPL.
|
||||
|
||||
Client libraries (cluster_client and so on) are dual-licensed under the same
|
||||
VNPL 1.1 and also GNU GPL 2.0 or later to allow for compatibility with GPLed
|
||||
software like QEMU and fio.
|
||||
|
||||
## VNPL
|
||||
|
||||
Vitastor Network Public License 1.1 (VNPL 1.1) is a copyleft license based on
|
||||
GNU GPLv3.0 with the additional "Network Interaction" clause which requires
|
||||
opensourcing all programs directly or indirectly interacting with Vitastor
|
||||
through a computer network and expressly designed to be used in conjunction
|
||||
@@ -20,18 +29,83 @@ the terms of the same license, but also under the terms of any GPL-Compatible
|
||||
Free Software License, as listed by the Free Software Foundation.
|
||||
This is a stricter copyleft license than the Affero GPL.
|
||||
|
||||
Please note that VNPL doesn't require you to open the code of proprietary
|
||||
software running inside a VM if it's not specially designed to be used with
|
||||
Vitastor.
|
||||
The idea of VNPL is, in addition to modules linked to Vitastor code in a single
|
||||
binary file, to extend copyleft action to micro-service modules only interacting
|
||||
with it over the network.
|
||||
|
||||
Basically, you can't use the software in a proprietary environment to provide
|
||||
its functionality to users without opensourcing all intermediary components
|
||||
standing between the user and Vitastor or purchasing a commercial license
|
||||
from the author 😀.
|
||||
|
||||
Client libraries (cluster_client and so on) are dual-licensed under the same
|
||||
VNPL 1.1 and also GNU GPL 2.0 or later to allow for compatibility with GPLed
|
||||
software like QEMU and fio.
|
||||
At the same time, VNPL doesn't impose any restrictions on software *not specially designed*
|
||||
to be used with Vitastor, for example, on Windows running inside a VM with a Vitastor disk.
|
||||
|
||||
You can find the full text of VNPL-1.1 in the file [VNPL-1.1.txt](../../VNPL-1.1.txt).
|
||||
GPL 2.0 is also included in this repository as [GPL-2.0.txt](../../GPL-2.0.txt).
|
||||
## Explanation
|
||||
|
||||
Network copyleft is governed by the clause **13. Remote Network Interaction** of VNPL.
|
||||
|
||||
A program is considered to be a "Proxy Program" if it meets both conditions:
|
||||
- It is specially designed to be used with Vitastor. Basically, it means that the program
|
||||
has any functionality specific to Vitastor and thus "knows" that it works with Vitastor,
|
||||
not with something random.
|
||||
- It interacts with Vitastor directly or indirectly through any programming interface,
|
||||
including API, CLI, network or any wrapper (also considered a Proxy Program itself).
|
||||
|
||||
If, in addition to that:
|
||||
- You give any user an apportunity to interact with Vitastor directly or indirectly through
|
||||
any computer interface including the network or any number of wrappers (Proxy Programs).
|
||||
|
||||
Then VNPL requires you to publish the code of all above Proxy Programs to all above users
|
||||
under the terms of any GPL-compatible license - that is, GPL, LGPL, MIT/BSD or Apache 2,
|
||||
because "GPL compatibility" is treated as an ability to legally include licensed code in
|
||||
a GPL application.
|
||||
|
||||
So, if you have a "Proxy Program", but it's not open to the user who directly or indirectly
|
||||
interacts with Vitastor - you are forbidden to use Vitastor under the terms of VNPL and you
|
||||
need a commercial license which doesn't contain open-source requirements.
|
||||
|
||||
## Examples
|
||||
|
||||
- Vitastor Kubernetes CSI driver which creates PersistentVolumes by calling `vitastor-cli create`.
|
||||
- Yes, it interacts with Vitastor through vitastor-cli.
|
||||
- Yes, it is designed specially for use with Vitastor (it has no sense otherwise).
|
||||
- So, CSI driver **definitely IS** a Proxy Program and must be published under the terms of
|
||||
a free software license.
|
||||
- Windows, installed in a VM with the system disk on Vitastor storage.
|
||||
- Yes, it interacts with Vitastor indirectly - it reads and writes data through the block
|
||||
device interface, emulated by QEMU.
|
||||
- No, it definitely isn't designed specially for use with Vitastor - Windows was created long
|
||||
ago before Vitastor and doesn't know anything about it.
|
||||
- So, Windows **definitely IS NOT** a Proxy Program and VNPL doesn't require to open it.
|
||||
- Cloud control panel which makes requests to Vitastor Kubernetes CSI driver.
|
||||
- Yes, it interacts with Vitastor indirectly through the CSI driver, which is a Proxy Program.
|
||||
- May or may not be designed specially for use with Vitastor. How to determine exactly?
|
||||
Imagine that Vitastor is replaced with any other storage (for example, with a proprietary).
|
||||
Do control panel functions change in any way? If they do (for example, if snapshots stop working),
|
||||
then the panel contains specific functionality and thus is designed specially for use with Vitastor.
|
||||
Otherwise, the panel is universal and isn't designed specially for Vitastor.
|
||||
- So, whether you are required to open-source the panel also **depends** on whether it
|
||||
contains specific functionality or not.
|
||||
|
||||
## Why?
|
||||
|
||||
Because I believe into the spirit of copyleft (Linux wouldn't became so popular without GPL!)
|
||||
and, at the same time, I want to have a way to monetize the product.
|
||||
|
||||
Existing licenses including AGPL are useless for it with an SDS - SDS is a very deeply
|
||||
internal software which is almost definitely invisible to the user and thus AGPL doesn't
|
||||
require anyone to open the code even if they make a proprietary fork.
|
||||
|
||||
And, in fact, the current situation in the world where GPL is though to only restrict direct
|
||||
linking of programs into a single executable file, isn't much correct. Nowadays, programs
|
||||
are more often linked with network API calls, not with /usr/bin/ld, and a software product
|
||||
may consist of dozens of microservices interacting with each other over the network.
|
||||
|
||||
That's why we need VNPL to keep the license sufficiently copyleft.
|
||||
|
||||
## License Texts
|
||||
|
||||
- VNPL 1.1 in English: [VNPL-1.1.txt](../../VNPL-1.1.txt)
|
||||
- VNPL 1.1 in Russian: [VNPL-1.1-RU.txt](../../VNPL-1.1-RU.txt)
|
||||
- GPL 2.0: [GPL-2.0.txt](../../GPL-2.0.txt)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ Vitastor Network Public License 1.1, основанная на GNU GPL 3.0 с д
|
||||
|
||||
## Примеры
|
||||
|
||||
- Kubernetes CSI-драйвер Vitastor, создающий PersistentVolume с помощью вызова vitastor-cli create.
|
||||
- Kubernetes CSI-драйвер Vitastor, создающий PersistentVolume с помощью вызова `vitastor-cli create`.
|
||||
- Да, взаимодействует с Vitastor через vitastor-cli.
|
||||
- Да, создавался специально для работы с Vitastor (иначе в чём же ещё его смысл).
|
||||
- Значит, CSI-драйвер **точно считается** "прокси-программой" и должен быть открыт под свободной
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user